Reply : Anonymous5

Thanks for sharing, we fully agree with you. Lecruz is responsible for our investment return.

LAT

 

Anonymous5 said...

I think that LECRUZ is cannot be labeled a scam yet!! LECRUZ is doing it professionally and legally. They "have" handed it over to Wijaya Group. The group is going to come up with written agreement which the investors have to sign. "Investors don't have a choice". But going by the protest, they might make a very good offer. Once signed by investors LECRUZ is no more legally responsible for our investment. That is when all our investment are going to get stuck.We must understand Lecruz is a legitimate junket business registed in Macau. The counterpart in Canada whose registration document shown on Lecruz.com website, is reported to be a dormant business; unlike Macau operations. Therefore, any litigation filed against Canada operations going to give limited returns. Any actions against Lecruz has to be focused on its Macau business. Being a junket for casinos, need a large bank deposit of several hundred million dollars in addition to impeccable reputation. Therefore,if we insist that LECRUZ, remains responsible for our investment and stop negotiating ANY deal with Wijaya Group; there is a good possiblity we will win. If LECRUZ says, it doesn't want to run the MLM, it CANNOT simply absorb all our money freely into its account. It is ILLEGAL. Please understand, Junket business in Macau is regulated strickly by Macau authorities. That is why the team of MLM leaders were going around the country explaining the new Wijaya Deal. It is a trap once we sign and accept it. Lecruz, is a multimillion dollar business entity whereas Wijaya is an individual who had been working for Lecruz. Therefore, although our Lecruz investment looks gone; it is not gone until we had signed the new deal with Mr. Wijaya or any third party. Then this will become a scam, unwinable in any court.Therefore,don't be rattled by present scenario of low returns. It is a psychological war. 1) Please insist to all the MLM leaders that we hold LECRUZ RESPONSIBLE FOR ACCEPTING OUR INVESTMENT THRU THEIR LOCAL AGENT IN MALAYSIA.The money trail is traceable.2)If Lecruz doesn't want to run MLM, IT SHOULD PAY THE PROMISED AMOUNT NEVERTHELESS. It is accountable for the promises made in the presentations by the local agents in Malaysia.3) If it fail to do so, the ensuing mass police report, with media publicity, will damage its business prospects in the region (Malaysia & Singapore included). That will be more damaging than any litigation. Refunding the investors is going to be least costly outlet for LECRUZ. They will take a less damaging path! (ex-makkal sakthi)

October 18, 2009 2:56 AM